Okay, in our case this solution is fine, then. Thanks for the quick answers, really nice! :)<br clear="all"><pre>-
Joost van Dongen
Lead programmer / co-founder
Ronimo Games
<a href="http://www.ronimo-games.com/" target="_blank">www.ronimo-games.com</a>
</pre><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 November 2012 17:08, Gregory Maxwell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmaxwell@gmail.com" target="_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Joost van Dongen<br>
<<a href="mailto:joost@ronimo-games.com">joost@ronimo-games.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I gave it a try, and that indeed fixes the problem! :) Since you mention<br>
> this is "primarily useful for testing", is there any downside to turning<br>
> this on, or can I freely do so without worrying it will break something<br>
> else?<br>
<br>
</div>I was quoting the man page there, it's primarily useful for testing<br>
because testing is an application where getting an identical file is<br>
useful.<br>
<br>
The only downside is that if you set all your files to the same serial<br>
number you won't be able to create larger chained files concatenating<br>
them. If you don't do this in your application then it's not an issue.<br>
If you do, you'll want to give each file a unique serial number.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>