<div dir="ltr">A half finished product? No, i don't see how having different parts of the audio under different tracks makes it unfinished at all... Using your picasso analogy, you would get the whole thing, and be able to see it all, or just the parts that you liked. I don't think your analogy works very well. Think of it this way-- there's a song that i have. With all the instruments on different tracks, i can turn off the vocals and do karaoke, i can take out the drums so i can practice my drumming, or i could take out everything but the guitar to try to learn the guitar part of the song, etc. <br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tor-einar@jarnbjo.name">tor-einar@jarnbjo.name</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Although, when I come to think about it ... The artist probably has nothing to say when it comes to a decision if an album should be sold as MT9 and the music labels have nothing even close to artistic pride, but would probably be very interested in earning more money by selling the same product a second time, wrapped in different paper.<br>
<br>
Tor<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
Tor-Einar Jarnbjo schrieb:</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I doubt if the artists and music labels are interested in distributing a half-finished product like Guardian describes. If I buy a Picasso, I wouldn't expect it to be delivered as a blank sheet of paper and crayons either, although it would enable me to avoid the bizarre cubism features <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>