Parsability requirements of PART tag (Was: Re: [vorbis] Vorbis Comment question)

[Jonathan Walther]

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 05:10:52PM -0700, al goldstein wrote:
>Why not indicate the order on the track lable? Eg: 01farfel1.ogg;
>02farfel2.ogg; 03gumball1.ogg;04gumball2.ogg ;05gumball3.ogg etc.

Suppose the file gets deleted.  You frantically undelete it.  Now the
filename is gone; you have to assign it one.  If the filename was the
only place certain information was located, you are just out of luck.
If you fully tag your files, assigning it a reasonable filename becomes
easy.

Jonathan


-- 

    It's not true unless it makes you laugh,                           
             but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.      

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                     Geek House Productions, Ltd.

  Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
  QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
  General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998

Phone:   604-435-1205
Email:   djw at reactor-core.org
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC  V5R2W2


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20030704/97af885d/part.pgp