[vorbis] just an idea about quality evaluation

[Paul Martin]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:43:06AM -0600, Graham Mitchell wrote:
> > Are you using any kind of 'this file was transcoded from...' comment at
> > all? I'm curious to know if there's any kind of growing de facto standard.
> 
> There may be, but I don't use it.  In fact, I don't comment my oggs at all.  
> Call me old school, but my meta-information is of the form:
> 
> /music/Cake/Fashion_Nugget/Friend_Is_A_Four_Letter_Word.ogg

Me neither...

Rolling_Stones-Hot_Rocks_1964-1971__CD1/09_Rolling_Stones-Paint_It_Black.ogg

with another file nearby containing

0228.4 0222.0 -1.559155 09_Rolling_Stones-Paint_It_Black.ogg

First figure is total length of track
Second figure is the fadeout point
Third figure is the replay gain

Similarly I have another file containing:

0429.8 0420.2 -1.679049 01_Derek_and_the_Dominos-Layla.mp3


-- 
Paul Martin <pm at zetnet.net> (work)
  <pm at nowster.zetnet.co.uk> (home)
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.