[vorbis] Interesting file-sharing idea
Mij
of_mij at freemail.it
Sun Mar 17 02:18:30 PST 2002
Domenica, Marzo 17, 2002, alle 02:15 AM, craig duncan ha scritto:
> Why is there no reason? If i like an artist's CD, then i'd like to be
> able to listen to the whole CD (with good fidelity). And on what basis
> can you say that $13/$15 isn't too much? I feel it's far too much.
Maybe I've not been able to express well what I think. I've talked about
actual
MusicSharing community. On the basic concept there's no controls (right
now, in these days),
I expressed I don't like the people use this tecnology as alternative
for buying original cds. I told that 13Dollars/15Euros aren't a huge
expense for something as one cd in two Months. This will became
expensive when you buy every music you listen to... but this is an
exception.
This is my humile opinion.
<p>> Where the artist gets maybe $1-$2 of that (if they're lucky) and the
> production of the actual CD is under $1, why would i be willing to pay
> $15 ($12+ profit) to a huge multinational corporation which, by these
> kind of practices, damages the relationship between artist and listener
> and makes the only genuine alternative one where the artist has to
> assume the whole burden of production, distribution, marketing, etc. In
> that instance, i'm certainly (quite) willing to give the artist $15 for
> a CD -- if i know that all the money goes to them. But _only_ in that
> circumstance.
This is right, and it's a well-known problem linked to the physical
supports: it squanders
much money. But please don't think "I pay 15$, the artist receive 2$,
the production 1$ => the bastard cd labels robbed the whole rest".
Please consider that this morphology of music divulgation hides big
expenses. Take in example that the distribution costs 15%, there's a 5%
of recharge by the last vendor and approximatively 20% (here in Europe)
on the whole price goes into the State's pockets. The multinational
retain c.ca 35%. I agree with this, because they work: their work
consists in the risk trying to launch artist not even known. Something
goes well and produce money, something goes bad and finish to be a big
expense.
To know that half our money into the trash isn't good, but so it is...
<p>> You're trying to define what seems to you to be a reasonable practice
> and i agree that to me it sounds reasonable also. But the large media
> congolmerates wouldn't agree with you. Unless they explicitly provide
> something for free (a decision carefully calculated to maximize their
> profits) they don't want you having _anything_ for free. By their
> definition, if you got the music from someone else who was willing to
> "share" it with you and the licensing rights to that music hadn't been
> paid for by someone in this transaction, then it's piracy.
Sincerely I don't belong to this no-global philosophy... the big
multinational give us computers, cellular telephons, handheld, but even
foreign culture. It's clear that they search their (economical) own
profit, but I take (various type) profit too.
I don't follow my behaviour to respect the "written law", simply I
follow what I think correct.
I think that's correct I pay for a program I like, but I think that's
wrong that i should pay one more licence for any pc onto I want to
install.
Nevertheless, I have c.ca 120 (original) cds, and about 300Mb mp3 on my
disk: these are "isolated" songs. I like they only on a whole cd, or
I've not been able to find its original.
<p>> Big corporations would _never_ dare allow to leave responsibility in the
> hands of the people. How can you ripoff people, treat them
> exploitatively and with disrespect, and at the same time treat them with
> respect as if they were mature, responsible and trustworthy?
You're completely right. Please consider anyway that on the net their
effective power is about nothing. I ment this: since they can do nothing
on the large people (they have only control over commercial companies
and such), we can do what we want. Well, I hope we'll have the
capabilities to take the responsability for keep respect of other
interest.
Finally, please excuse my english: it's not perfect and sometime it's
diffucult for me to express
well what I want.
<p>bye
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list