[vorbis] applaud.wav sounds worse in 1.0?

[Nicola Larosa]

> Now the only sample that needs -q 3 to be transparent is fatboy.wav (at 
> the same location).

My bad, that should be velvet.wav , specifically the hi-hat gets periodic at 
-q 2 and lower levels.

Instead fatboy.wav is easier, but nonetheless exhibits a peculiar behavior 
if resampled at 22050 Hz: a kind of "breathing" that is absent in the 
original, and in the non-resampled oggs.

<p>
-- 
"Oddly enough, Python's use of whitespace stopped
feeling unnatural after about twenty minutes."
   Eric S. Raymond

Nicola Larosa - nico at tekNico.net

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.