[vorbis] Icecast2 in xiph CVS, PATCH!
gcp at sjeng.org
Thu Sep 27 15:16:42 PDT 2001
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Per Wigren wrote:
> Thursday 27 September 2001 12.06 skrev du:
> > Bitrate peeling is still a way off - the current encoder wouldn't
> > sound good with peeling, even though the format supports it and it
> > would work. Once the encoder can generate output that will give
> > good results when peeled, I'll add that.
> You mean that my 10000+ OGGs cannot be peeled, not even when the peeling code
> is available in libvorbis??!!
> I've used Gian-Carlo's RC2-GT1 version for all of them...
As I understand it, the problem is that the peeler would have
to know about the psychoacoustics to know what to peel. So
the encoder must structure the ogg in a fit way so that the
peeler can deduce what to remove or not.
Do I got this right? Is it possible to make a 'smart' peeler
that can handle oggs that aren't structured in that way?
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis