[vorbis] Vorbis 1.0 before the end of the year?

[Greg Wooledge]

Mark Hetherington (mark.hetherington at studentmail.newcastle.edu.au) wrote:

> Sorry, I understood that, but my point was more that it be called "1.0" so 
> that manufacturers waiting for 1.0 can say "Right there's a 1.0 decoder, so 
> now we can use that in our product". The "1.0" thing is a psychological 
> milestone for many end users.

You're right, but I can't help noting with some irony that 1.0 is also
an ANTI-milestone for the other half of the users.  Usually, when
someone releases version 1.0 of something, that's the version you want
to AVOID... use 0.9.9 or wait for 1.0.1. :-/


-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg at wooledge.org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |



<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<LI>application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
</UL>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 241 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20011103/c73fdf7a/part.obj