[vorbis] RE: [advanced] Response to Ogg Vorbis comments

[Moritz Grimm]

Greg Hogan wrote:
> > We have no misconception here.  But I hope you understand that we can
> > only test and evaluate what you have today.  Comparing your tomorrow's
> > version against today's version of everyone else doesn't make sense now,
> > does it?
> A Microsoft employee criticizing the announcement of future developments?
> Vorbis must really be corrupting you :).  I never thought I would hear this
> from Microsoft:  "Comparing your tomorrow's version against today's version
> of everyone else doesn't make sense now, does it?"

Score! :D

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hills/9267/fuddef.html
(link found on http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween1.html )

Amir seems not to like FUD ... ;) Not that I believe that the Vorbis
project praticises FUD, it's just that Amir complains about a standard
procedure within those tactics that are typical for Microsoft these
days.

Moritz

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.