[vorbis] TwinVQ versus The World

[aardvaak]

At 11:35 23/06/01 +0200, you wrote:
>I would really appreciate information about AAC. That is so hard to have
>some interesting ones!
>There's another format I just discovered : MPEGplus. The only information I
>found are far too much subjectives. Anyone have some?
>
>At 16:15 21/06/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >The last few threads have really been interesting.  Technologies
> >that are currently on the market are MP3, RealAudio, and Windows
> >Media (pre-version8).  Technologies currently in progress or
> >just shipped are Ogg Vorbis and mp3pro.  I don't think anyone
> >has mentioned TwinVQ on this list.  While exploring alternatives
> >to MP3 (which is when I also found Vorbis), I noticed TwinVQ.  I
> >encoded a few tracks with TwinVQ and they sounded like shit, but
> >does anyone still consider TwinVQ a serious competitor in the
> >compressed audio market?  Does it have _any_ advantages over
> >anything else?  How about AAC?
> >
> >Thanks for everyone's reply ahead of time.

 
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.