[vorbis] TwinVQ versus The World
aardvaak at ifrance.com
Sat Jun 23 05:39:57 PDT 2001
At 11:35 23/06/01 +0200, you wrote:
>I would really appreciate information about AAC. That is so hard to have
>some interesting ones!
>There's another format I just discovered : MPEGplus. The only information I
>found are far too much subjectives. Anyone have some?
>At 16:15 21/06/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >The last few threads have really been interesting. Technologies
> >that are currently on the market are MP3, RealAudio, and Windows
> >Media (pre-version8). Technologies currently in progress or
> >just shipped are Ogg Vorbis and mp3pro. I don't think anyone
> >has mentioned TwinVQ on this list. While exploring alternatives
> >to MP3 (which is when I also found Vorbis), I noticed TwinVQ. I
> >encoded a few tracks with TwinVQ and they sounded like shit, but
> >does anyone still consider TwinVQ a serious competitor in the
> >compressed audio market? Does it have _any_ advantages over
> >anything else? How about AAC?
> >Thanks for everyone's reply ahead of time.
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis