[vorbis] Why is ogg123 so much slower than XMMS?

Wilson defiler at null.net
Mon Dec 17 06:48:29 PST 2001



Can't you mount a loopback filesystem using /dev/null with losetup?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugo van der Merwe" <hugovdm at mail.com>
To: <vorbis at xiph.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [vorbis] Why is ogg123 so much slower than XMMS?

<p>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:53:36AM -0000, Alen Ladavac wrote:
> > People, are you trying to profile a program by using system monitoring
> > tools? Again? It was discussed for Win32 last time on this ml (iirc),
but I
> > don't see why would it be much more accurate under other OSs. I mean,
task
> > schedulers are not ment to be used for profiling, they only give
approximate
> > info. The general rule of the thumb should be: don't use a tool for
> > something it is not designed for.
>
> Here's a quick thought on testing xmms speed: disk writer plugin ...
> problem is, disk writing speed will slow it down. So how can one write
> to /dev/null? It wants a directory, so that it can create a file inside
> it, maybe a ramdisk using tmpfs or something? But who's got that amount
> of RAM... we need a nullfs. <g>
>
> Other ideas for seeing how fast xmms really decodes? (Without running a
> compiler...)
>

<p><p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.



More information about the Vorbis mailing list