[vorbis] (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded TAGS

[Wilson]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Walther" <krooger at debian.org>
To: <vorbis at xiph.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [vorbis] (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded
TAGS

>I imagine you think that classical music listeners should just go off in
>a corner and play by themselves?  Maybe they should use their own
>"special" ghettoized version of ogg123 and the other ogg tools?  Maybe
>use their own "special" encoders too?  All hail King Pop!  I guess if
>people want to know what that mystery file they are listening to is,
>they'll jolly well have to guess!
>
I think that classical music fans (myself included) would be better served
by putting all the extra information (conductor, etc, etc) into the
"Comments" field. Remember, it can be as long as you like, more or less.

Do you really need the name of the conductor to show up in the Winamp
playlist? I don't.

>
>On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:06:34PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
>>> So, the ensemble isn't considered performers. So, what about a duet ? A
trio
>>> ? Where is the limit ?
>>
>>You're beginning to realize what a crock this whole scheme is.

<p><p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.