[vorbis] RC2 vs. beta4 (test)
Gregory Maxwell
greg at linuxpower.cx
Thu Aug 23 13:00:02 PDT 2001
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 01:53:08PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> > Additionally, it has been stated many times that you
> > _should_ _never_ _transcode_ _any_ _lossy_ _codec_.
>
> No, but I still think it's very useful to know what the failure cases
> look like.
>
> Does vorbis converge in quality, or does it keep getting worse, etc?
Back in the B2 days I tested this, when using the same encoder over and over
again, the quality converged fairly well on both a SNR and perceptual level.
I would imagine that if there was any modification of the file or encoder
between codings, the result would be much less positive.
(generally, anything that changes the blocking/window positions will tend to
make the results not converge.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list