[vorbis] Windows XP and MP3

[Jack Moffitt]

> This is too _small_ a difference to be realistic.

Not really. I got similar results with Winamp and Sonique.  There's a
lot more going on that decoding, like Visualizations, GUI updates, and
whatnot.  It seemed reasonabe that there would be a 2% difference.
Especially when you consider that that 2% is probably the same 2% you
see in mpg123, or nearly.  Visualizations take a fair amount of cpu.

> > P200, and Mp3 took ~20-22% where Ogg was ~24-25%.  Both were in Win98.
> 
> These numbers are _way_ too high for a 200 MHz cpu, even if it is a P5.

Again, there's probably more stuff going on than just decoding audio.
That's why testing winamp or sonique is almost futile.

jack.

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.