[vorbis] 'Jukebox' quality?

[Hugo van der Merwe]

> High bitrate encoding is in their at the moment, but I expect it will want
> a lot more tweaking to do archival quality at bitrates that compete with
> LAME. I think I heard that in theory vorbis could do 160 av VBR at
> archival quality (without wavelets) compared to LAME's 180 av. That's way
> after 1.0 is released, though.

This brought up the thought again: What's the difference between files
encoded with `vorbize`, `oggenc`, and `lame --ogg`? This project hasn't
even reached 1.0, and there's already 3 different encoders... I think
that's a good sign, though.

Hugo van der Merwe

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.