[vorbis] Re: [vorbis-dev] bug in glibc 2.1.2 and older
R.L. Horn
rlhorn at mailroom.com
Sat Jun 24 16:00:44 PDT 2000
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Monty wrote:
> I was wrong. It seems that glibc 2.1.2 and older is still alive and well.
It's worse than that: www.gnu.org still (at least as of a couple of days
ago) points to 2.1.2 as being the latest and greatest.
> If replacing libc is not an option, all C modules should be built with
> _D__NO_MATH_INLINES This will result in a performance sacrifice, but
> will produce correct binaries.
Compiling with optimization level 1 (-O or -O1) also apparently works (at
least it's worked for my linux-intel system) without the huge (~36%)
performance hit. For distribution or serious testing, however, I'd play
it safe for now and kill the inlines completely.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list