[vorbis] new MS codecs

[Dan Hollis]

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Steven Bailey wrote:
> > I'll agree with you that MP3's do not sound good at 128.  They've got
> > swishy artifacts that are apparent on almost any song with percussive
> > instruments.  But WMA's...  Maybe they've made an improvement in their
> > latest release, but all the WMA's I've ever encoded at any bitrate sound
> > like they've got tape-hiss in the background!  That background static is
> I read some of the MS patents which (presumably) relate to WMA last night.

What are the patent numbers so we can all read them?

-Dan

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.