[vorbis-dev] hi & rpms

[Thomas Vander Stichele]

Hi,

Seems majordomo allows me in now ;)
For those of you who don't know me, Vakor asked me to do 1.0 rpm packages 
right before the release, which I did.  I was pretty new to vorbis 
internals but I hope I managed to do a good job.

In any case, last night on IRC in #vorbis someone was pretty rude to me in 
complaining about a problem he had with them.  In the end I lost my 
temper because of the things he accused me of, but that doesn't change the 
fact that there might be a problem.  Of course, had he actually asked 
normally, he would've gotten the answer straight up, and even while being 
mad I took the time to provide him with the answers.

Let's start with the basic problem, it concerns libao.
The libao rpm I provided has plug-ins for oss, esd and alsa 0.9.  I think 
it's a good idea to have as many plug-ins as possible without actually 
requiring all of those underlying rpms - so the user has a choice of 
output plug-ins.  His "complaint" was that there wasn't any alsa rpm.
Well, there is one, which I made, and which I put in the readme I supplied 
with my packages (http://urgent.rug.ac.be/thomas/vorbis/)
The problem is that the rpm seems to "require" libasound.so.2.  That last 
one is an error which I should get fixed.

I checked last night and that readme didn't make it on vorbis.com - would 
it be possible to also put that readme online ? I think that was kind of 
his major gripe with the packages.

He did ignore the facts that
a) there IS a readme that explained the possible problems with the 
packages
b) he wasn't FORCED to install 0.8.3 of libao, since afaik 0.8.2 works 
fine as well

and on top of that, he wasn't even complaining for himself, since he 
builds them himself anyway, but about the countless of users he has had to 
help due to my stupidity.  I have been in and out of #vorbis after the 
release to check up on people having issues with the packages, and no one 
complained about what he actually complained about.

It is true however that the package for libao could be fixed to not 
explicitly require the alsa so library.  I will look into how to do that, 
because that's done by rpm's auto requirements lookup.  RPM decides, since 
the alsa libao plug-in requires that so, that the whole package requires 
it as well.  I know I can workaround that, I just need some time to do 
that right.

In the meantime, it might be easier if I could just coordinate all this 
rpm stuff with the person who puts them on the site at vorbis.com, so that 
I can get the problem fixed properly.

It's not because one person is incredibly rude to me that I don't want to 
help out anymore ;)

So, let me know who best to contact so I can get that fixed as quickly as 
possible.

Thanks,
Thomas


-- 

The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*-                      -*->
That's all changed for good
No more worries and doubts
The good will come out
<-*- thomas at apestaart.org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/

<p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.