[vorbis-dev] New version vorb_enc.dll

[zitt at zittware.com]

Sounds like a good plan to me... however, I'd like to make a counter
suggestion.

How about a Superset of the BladeEnc interface? Maybe the new spec should
allow the old interface to work for "broken" / "old" clients... but should
be adaptable for new clients that want to support the bigger/better spec.

Just a suggestion,
John

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:43:40 +0200
 Holger Dors wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> > It will still work as a drop-in replacement for bladeenc.dll
> while I like the idea of one interface for all those great audio
> encoders, am I the only one who thinks that the BladeEnc interface is
> pushed beyond its limits? Just look at lame_enc, and compare that with
> all the options lame offers - there are a lot of them missing.
> 
> Wouldn't it be a good time to come up with something like a "Common
> Encoder Interface", where BladeEnc, Lame, Vorbis and perhaps FAAC
> would fit in better?
> 
> Just a thought...
> 
> Regards,
>   Holger Dors 			  mailto:dors at kittelberger.de
> 
> 
> 
> --- >8 ----
> List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
> Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
> 





---------------------------------------------------------
This message sent using EMUmail -- http://www.emumail.com
---------------------------------------------------------

Looking for the best deals available on the Net?

Try the Valet:

http://valet.flycast.com/valet/info/fc0494/?62741

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/