[vorbis-dev] Modification requests / question
msmith at labyrinth.net.au
Tue Dec 26 18:40:45 PST 2000
>It seems to me that if it's used only in two places, with some wrapping
>in one of them and specific acceptance for wrong results in the other,
>has a confusing name and is trivially simple, there are enough reasons
>to dispense of it altogether and hand-inline it in the two places.
It's done this way so that different implementations can be used (i.e. for
x86, there are simple assembly versions - they don't exactly follow ALL of
the IEEE rules, but they're good enough for the purposes of vorbis - and an
order of magnitude faster, if not more).
Otherwise, this would be a good suggestion.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis-dev