[tremor] Tremor on x86 vs ARM, performance highlights: CPU use 120x different
dilb
dilb at alrj.org
Fri Sep 13 18:39:32 PDT 2002
> I'm talking about the original tremor PLUS the Nicolas 'Honey I shrunk
> tremor in half' Pitre patch from a week back. The new stuff doesn't fit
> around the shrunken code. I don't have your asm mdct code which may
> account for the difference (33% vs 18%). To double-check the CPU use I run
> a console test version outputing to null and sure enough, same results (20
> seconds time per minute of CM). -q10 uses more CPU than -q5 for me, about
> 20% more?, but that may simply be a result of all the extra memory
> handling. I don't really know. Like most that aren't intimate with its
> construction, I'm happy it works at all.
I doubt my assembly version could by itself improve so much the CPU load :),
not that it would not be nice, but a little too much.
If you want to try my version, you can have it here:
http://520044965958-0001.bei.t-online.de/pub/OggVorbis_Decoder/OVD_v0.6/libvorbis_Tremor_20020906.tgz
I still don't know what quality settings you used (-q5 ?) to create your
vorbis files.
Dilb.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'tremor-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Tremor
mailing list