<div>Hi all,</div><div> </div><div>Very quickly if it could be of interest, I have added on my demo page (<a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a>) a higher quality setting for my codec (nhw_encoder.exe filename.bmp -h1).Files are larger of 3-6Ko.Precision is a little better.This is a first version, the quality setting is certainly not optimal for now...</div>
<div> </div><div>If you could find little time, any suggestion or improvement would be, as usual, very appreciated.If you also think that this thread would be more appropriate on another discussion group, also do not hesitate to let me know.</div>
<div> </div><div>Many thanks again,</div><div>Raphael<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/6/13 Raphael Canut <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nhwcodec@gmail.com" target="_blank">nhwcodec@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div>Hello,</div><div> </div><div>Just a quick message to let you know that my codec is now opensource, and I'm very happy with it.</div>
<div> </div><div>I have also just corrected 2 little errors in my previous version, and so this new version is a little better.I have updated the source code and binaries links on my demo page ( <a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a> ).Any comment or question about the codec is very welcome.</div>
<div>-I have also nearly validated 2 next higher quality settings (+5Ko and +8-10Ko in average), if it could be of interest, also do not hesitate to let me know.-</div><div> </div><div>Again, the only real "advantage" of my codec is that it is a fast codec, with notably a very fast decoding time I think.</div>
<div> </div><div>Very quickly to finish, if there would be some projects with open calls for new and low-complexity technology, and that my codec could be of interest, please do not hesitate to let me know (would be very helpful).</div>
<div> </div><div>Many thanks,</div><div>Raphael</div><div> </div><div><br><br> </div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/6/6 Jason Self <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jason@bluehome.net" target="_blank">jason@bluehome.net</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5"><div>Raphael Canut said:<br>
> this can be easily corrected.<br>
<br>
</div>Then please do.<br>
<div><br>
> The problem is that my codec is absolutely not finalized (my algorithm is<br>
> definitely not good on the 5% of rather compressed and "very blurred"<br>
images... > and that's a major drawback...), the source code would also really<br>
need to be<br>
> cleaned up...<br>
<br>
</div>The free software movement is not a technical movement. All of the things you've<br>
mentioned can be improved, and none are prerequisites to putting it under a<br>
proper free [1] license now.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html" target="_blank">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html</a><br>
<br></div></div><div class="im">_______________________________________________<br>
theora mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theora@xiph.org" target="_blank">theora@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>