<div>Hi again,</div><div> </div><div>If it could be of interest, I have added on my demo page the 3 test images compressed with a new version that I have just made... I have improved precision on the UV chroma components (and corrected a very little bug).</div>
<div> </div><div>Now, it is directly possible to compare the results of the first version with the last version, and see the precision improvements... But again it is very slight (even with some screenshots and zooms...).</div>
<div> </div><div>If you would have any suggestion about these improvements, or if there would be some parts where my codec would really need to be improved, do not hesitate to let me know, would be really appreciated.</div>
<div> </div><div>Many thanks,</div><div>Raphael<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/5/25 Daniel Hendrycks <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kondo8@hotmail.com" target="_blank">kondo8@hotmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:00:01 -0500, <<a href="mailto:theora-request@xiph.org">theora-request@xiph.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Message: 1<br>
> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:26:18 +0200<br>
> From: Raphael Canut <<a href="mailto:nhwcodec@gmail.com">nhwcodec@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Subject: [theora] NHW codec - improvement of precision<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:theora@xiph.org">theora@xiph.org</a><br>
> Message-ID:<br>
> <CAKE58qHqSsrgJP4OX++eetMmT2WTv=<a href="mailto:8ZvfXoou7bWjOnbUSrAQ@mail.gmail.com">8ZvfXoou7bWjOnbUSrAQ@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
><br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> Just contact you quickly as I have improved precision of my codec (a<br>
> little) and I have updated my demo page: <a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a><br>
> .This<br>
> version seems a little better.<br>
> I will also certainly have to do an image comparison with other codecs,<br>
> Google WebP for example, which has a very impressive precision, and to<br>
> show<br>
> that my codec would have less precision but maybe a little more neatness.<br>
><br>
> Any comment would be really appreciated.<br>
><br>
> Many thanks,<br>
> Raphael<br>
Could you post screenshots of the improvements?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
<br>
Daniel Hendrycks<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
theora mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theora@xiph.org">theora@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>