<div>Hi again,</div><div> </div><div>Just very quickly, I forgot to add, as I had a request, that I made a version with more neatness, but I prefer currently more precision, seems more important.I could add a "neatness parameter" as an encoder option (rather simple to the contrary of precision setting, file size will be nearly the same, and encoding/decoding times are the same), but maybe precision is the really first parameter to improve?</div>
<div> </div><div>Any advice and comment would be very helpful.</div><div> </div><div>Many thanks for your time,</div><div>Raphael<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/5/11 Raphael Canut <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nhwcodec@gmail.com" target="_blank">nhwcodec@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div>Hello,</div><div> </div><div>Just contact you quickly again, for those interested, I have made a new version of my codec with a little more precision.This version seems a little better, -I have updated my demo page: <a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a> -.If you would have time, any comment (or critics) from the Xiph Community would be really very appreciated.</div>
<div> </div><div>(Also I made a previous update to correct a bug, if there would be some images where my codec bugs, do not hesitate to let me know, would be also very helpful)...</div><div> </div><div>Many thanks,</div>
<div>
Raphael</div>
</blockquote></div><br>