[theora] Steve Jobs about theora
gregory.ewing at univie.ac.at
Sat May 1 01:26:24 PDT 2010
Shayne Wissler wrote:
> If/when it turns out to be true, don't say I didn't warn you.
> There is no reliable defense against patents, particularly given how
> it they have been applied to software.
There is a good defense. When someone actually gives you the patent
numbers of the patents that they claim you infringe. You can often code
around it. I have read a lot of "codec" patents. Many can be avoided by
simply doing things differently-but mathematically "equivalent" as far
as the format is concerned.
Example: One patent makes some claim that "lifting" a established DCT
transform matrix is an invention thats patentable. But the patent claims
are restricted to integer arithmetic with bit shifts. So the same
lifting scheme using floats would avoid *all* the claims in this patent.
There is also quite a few patents hitting the expired list. So you can
use their claims to the letter and have a prior art defense that may in
fact work. But code around seems more prudent without a big legal fund.
This is one reason that "patent" FUD campaigner's never give specifics
against any OS project. By the time it mattered we wouldn't be infringing.
More information about the theora