[theora] is this FUD or not?
Tom Sparks
tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au
Tue Mar 23 20:02:04 PDT 2010
--- On Wed, 24/3/10, Benjamin M. Schwartz <bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
> From: Benjamin M. Schwartz <bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [theora] is this FUD or not?
> To: "Tom Sparks" <tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au>
> Cc: theora at xiph.org
> Received: Wednesday, 24 March, 2010, 1:42 PM
> Tom Sparks wrote:
> > I have just got an email was trying to source videos
> for theora test media
> >
> > here is the message:
> > "Intrinsically H.264 properly encoded should be about
> 30% more efficient than Theora."
> >
> > is this FUD or not?
>
> I don't see any Fear, Uncertainty, or Doubt spread by that
> sentence.
> Personally, I think it's a fairly reasonable sentence,
> though I wouldn't
> go so far as to say it's "true".
thank you, I want to hear it from someone, that is closer to theora than me
>
> --Ben
>
>
tom sparks
More information about the theora
mailing list