[theora] Marketing stuff
acolwell at real.com
Wed Sep 12 09:29:19 PDT 2007
I have issues with the following info on the page
On the technological side Ogg Theora is well engineered for low-bitrate
streaming. Its in-loop deblocking filter is pretty efficient at
a distracting, blocky look of the encoded content. Thus perceived video
quality usually degrades gracefully as bitrate decreases, much in
to compression schemes still widely used such as MPEG-4 Part 2 (best
for DivX and XviD), H.263 (often used as video codec for Flash video) or
Windows Media Video 8.
In my opinion I believe that these claims are anecdotal at best. Has
done a true bake off between Theora and the codecs mentioned? Has anyone
vs bitrate or similar comparisons across a large and diverse body of
me these types of comparisons are far more compelling than a zoomed in
area of a single
frame where the deblocking filter happened to do a good job.
Don't get me wrong. I'd like to see Theora succeed. I just don't think
your going to win over a whole lot of people
unless you provide hard data that shows that Theora is truely a viable
competitor performance-wise with the other
popular formats. I don't think the touchy feely "I'm using an open
codec" is going to be enough. Making claims that
can't be backed up or turn out to be false will only hurt your cause.
Maik Merten wrote:
> I took the liberty of quickly slamming together
> http://www.theora.org/benefits/ . This is supposed to answer the "why
> should you use Theora" question in some detail.
> This section is not yet included in the navigation bar and I'd like to
> get confirmation that this information can be considered "canon" before
> making it "visible" (oh, and of course someone speaking the english
> language should give it a read to iron out at least the most outstanding
> language bloopers).
> theora mailing list
> theora at xiph.org
More information about the theora