Henry, <div><br></div><div>There's been a fair bit of discussion about this, including some specific suggestions at reducing memory footprint, processor utilization (using a lower quality level), etc.</div><div><br></div>
<div>Search through the speex-dev archives, and you'll probably find what you're looking for.</div><div>If you don't find what you're looking for, feel free to come back and ask some more specific questions :)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Here's a good google search to use to help the searching:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; white-space: pre; ">site:<a href="http://lists.xiph.org">lists.xiph.org</a> speex-dev <your specific search terms here></span><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Henry Gomersall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:whg21@cam.ac.uk">whg21@cam.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Does anybody have experience of implementing Speex encoding on<br>
low-power, low-cost bare-metal embedded hardware?<br>
<br>
I'm trying to get a feel for minimum possible hardware upon which it is<br>
possible to get a reasonable working implementation of Speex encoding.<br>
<br>
I can find little in this area on the website or via Google.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Henry<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Speex-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Speex-dev@xiph.org">Speex-dev@xiph.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Keith Kyzivat<br><br>SIPez LLC.<br>SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting<br><a href="http://www.SIPez.com">http://www.SIPez.com</a><br>tel: +1 (617) 273-4000<br>
</div>