[Speex-dev] Speex on TI DSP 5505

[Randy Yates]

Saju Palayur <saju_pa at hotmail.com> writes:

> Hi 
>
>  
>
> When we run the profiler these 3 functions take more than 8500 cycles.
>
>  
>
> split_cb_search_shape_sign_N1() 22782
> pitch_search_3tap() 19208
> lpc_to_lsp() 16007
>  
> So can I configure these in a different way so it takes less cycles.

I am not familiar with the code, so I can't say. I was trying to teach
you how to optimize, not give you an optimization.

--Randy

> I do not need very high sound quality
>  
> Thanks for your time
>
> Warm Regards 
> Saju
>
>  > From: yates at ieee.org
>> To: saju_pa at hotmail.com
>> CC: speex-dev at xiph.org
>> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex on TI DSP 5505
>> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:55:55 -0400
>> 
>> Saju Palayur <saju_pa at hotmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > We have ported the Narrow band 8 Khz Speex encoder and decoder on to TI DSP 5505
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > To compress 20ms of 16 bit audio sampled at 8Khz it takes 4.2ms.
>> >
>> > Is there any optimizations I can do to make it run faster.
>> 
>> The first thing to do would be to profile the code (I assume you're
>> using CCS) and see where the most time is being spent. 
>> 
>> --Randy
>> 
>> > 
>> >
>> > Thanks for yor time
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Saju
>> >
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Speex-dev mailing list
>> > Speex-dev at xiph.org
>> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>> 
>> -- 
>> Randy Yates % "She tells me that she likes me very much,
>> Digital Signal Labs % but when I try to touch, she makes it
>> mailto://yates@ieee.org % all too clear."
>> http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % 'Yours Truly, 2095', *Time*, ELO 
>  		 	   		  

-- 
Randy Yates                      % "Ticket to the moon, flight leaves here today 
Digital Signal Labs              %  from Satellite 2"
mailto://yates@ieee.org          % 'Ticket To The Moon' 
http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % *Time*, Electric Light Orchestra