[Speex-dev] Speex ver 1.1.10 decoder problem

Christina Saputra chr1zt1na at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 27 23:33:24 PDT 2005


Hi,

I've just encountered another problem with the
decoder. I've been experimenting with the preprocessor
vad command option that my colleague has added in
speexenc and managed to get a spx file (from wav file)
that seems to be okay (i.e. no noise when I listened
to it), however when I decode it back to wav file,
there were some noise at the beginning of the file
(just at the beginning). Does anyone know whether this
is another decoder problem or something else? 


Thanks 

--- Christina Saputra <chr1zt1na at yahoo.com> wrote:

> It's working fine now...
> 
> Thanks for your help 
> 
> --- Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca>
> wrote:
> 
> > OK, that was a stupid error in the le_int
> prototype.
> > It's fixed in svn
> > now.
> > 
> > 	Jean-Marc
> > 
> > Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 11:53 +1000,
> > Jean-Marc Valin a écrit :
> > > OK, it seems like I screwed up the wav header
> code
> > between 1.1.8 and
> > > 1.1.9. Everything seems fine (playing to
> soundcard
> > also works), except
> > > that the length reported for the wav is too
> short,
> > which is why it stops
> > > player. Actually forcing the player to continue
> > past the end gives the
> > > whole file. I'll check what went wrong and try
> to
> > fix it when I have
> > > some time. It's likely in speexdec.c or wav_io.c
> > in case you want to
> > > look at it. Note to others, there's nothing
> wrong
> > with libspeex or even
> > > speexenc. The only thing that doesn't work is
> when
> > using speexdec to
> > > decode to wav.
> > > 
> > > 	Jean-Marc
> > > 
> > > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 17:32 -0700,
> > Christina Saputra a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I just started using speex recently and I've
> > been
> > > > having problem with Speex ver. 1.1.10 decoder.
> I
> > used
> > > > Speex to encode a wav file to spx then decode
> it
> > back
> > > > to wav file to see the voice quality that
> > results from
> > > > different speex options. Somehow, I couldn't
> get
> > the
> > > > original wav file back. I used both Speex ver
> > 1.1.6
> > > > and ver 1.1.10 to both encode and decode,
> > despite the
> > > > same output file sizes, the output file from
> ver
> > > > 1.1.10 decoder only lasts for a few seconds
> (the
> > file
> > > > is supposed to be a few minutes long). 
> > > > 
> > > > I have also tried decoding the wav file that
> was
> > > > encoded with ver 1.1.10 encoder with ver 1.1.6
> > decoder
> > > > and it works fine.. So I supposed the problem
> is
> > in
> > > > the ver 1.1.10 decoder. 
> > > > 
> > > > Have anyone experienced the same problem? Any
> > > > suggestions or comments would be really
> > appreciated 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks heaps
> > > > 
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around 
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > Speex-dev mailing list
> > > > Speex-dev at xiph.org
> > > >
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speex-dev mailing list
> > > Speex-dev at xiph.org
> > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


More information about the Speex-dev mailing list