[Speex-dev] Multiple Frames per Packet
Thu Jul 29 22:48:16 PDT 2004
<1091134545.3473AA89 at s29.dngr.org>
Message-ID: <1091166496.3071.6.camel at localhost>
On jeu, 2004-07-29 at 14:55 -0600, David Barrett wrote:
> Aha. Thanks. I don't seem to have speex_bits_insert_terminator(&bits);
> in my installed version (1.0.4), but I was able to use
> speex_bits_remaining(&bits). However, speex_bits_remaining(&bits)
> doesn't return 0 -- it returns -1 when it's empty.
Are you sure you're using 1.0.4 (with the right includes), because
speex_bits_insert_terminator() should be there and speex_bits_write()
should antomatically insert the terminator anyway.
> Odd, eh? But it works. Thanks!
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 2:37pm, Tom Grandgent wrote:
> > David,
> > Here's the trick ... do this just before your speex_bits_write():
> > speex_bits_insert_terminator(&bits);
> > Then, when decoding, keep calling speex_decode() until it returns -1
> > or speex_bits_remaining(&bits) returns 0.
> > Works for me, anyway.
> > Tom
> > David Barrett (dbarrett at quinthar.com) wrote:
> >> Hi, I'm using Speex and I want to pack multiple frames into a single
> >> packet. The manual (section 4.5) says to call "speex_encode()"
> >> multiple times before calling "speex_bits_write()", and then call
> >> "speex_decode()" until it returns -1. However, when I try that
> >> "speex_decode()" never returns -1, and it enters an infinite loop.
> >> I'm using 1.0.4.
> >> Any suggestions? Surely this isn't a new question. (Incidentally,
> >> the Xiph.org archives of this mailing list appear to be offline.
> >> Where are they now, or when will they come back online?)
> >> I've included some clips from my code below:
> >> -david
> >> ...
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca>
Universit? de Sherbrooke
More information about the Speex-dev