[paranoia] sample offset?

[bob van der Poel]

Matt McClure wrote:
> 
> On Sun Sep 10 2000, 01:51, Matt McClure <mlm at aya.yale.edu> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat Sep 09 2000, 21:22, Matt McClure <mlm at aya.yale.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > I've determined that my drive (SONY CD-RW CRX140E) consistently rips
> > > tracks offset by 566 samples, which makes it impossible to get a
> > > completely bit-accurate copy of a WAV after burning it to a CD.  I
> > > understand that cdparanoia does not currently have the ability to use a
> > > sample offset -- although an offset can be specified in hour, minute,
> > > second, and sector increments.  Are there any plans for future versions
> > > to allow sample offsets as well?
> > >
> > > How difficult would it be to implement this feature?
> >
> > After I sent this, I decided to take a closer look at the source.  With
> > this simple patch (see below), and setting CD_SAMPLE_OFFSET=566, I was
> > able to get 100% bit-accurate copies of some WAVs I burned.
> >
> > However, it did not work for the last track.  In the case of the final
> > track, the ripped wav had all 0's for the final 2264 bytes (or 566
> > samples).  Could anyone more familiar with the source comment on how
> > easy this would be to fix?
> 
> Hmmm.  Not much traffic here.  Is anyone listening?  I only got one
> response to my first message (Thanks, Keith), and none to my second.

Gee, and I thought it was me. I'm still trying to figure out why the
first track of some CD's gives me I/O errors when ripping. Oh well...


-- 
   __
  /  )      /         Bob van der Poel
 /--<  ____/__        bvdpoel at uniserve.com
/___/_(_) /_)         http://users.uniserve.com/~bvdpoel

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Paranoia homepage: http://www.xiph.org/paranoia/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'paranoia-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.