<div dir="ltr">Hi Jean-Marc,<div><br></div><div>Attached is an updated patch. I had to include some of Mark's suggestions in order to get the tests to work correctly. I will still submit a separate patch for him for a few other concerns he had after this one clears.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Drew</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:42 AM Jean-Marc Valin <<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Actually, there's also something wrong with the in_short() function. For<br>
floating point (#else case), you shouldn't need shifting since you're<br>
already doing the scaling through a float multiply.<br>
<br>
Jean-Marc<br>
<br>
On 11/23/2017 01:39 PM, Drew Allen wrote:<br>
> got it. actually that patch i sent you has something wrong with the<br>
> mapping_matrix_multiply_short_out... let me fix that and will send you<br>
> another patch soon.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Drew<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:34 AM Jean-Marc Valin <<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 11/23/2017 01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote:<br>
> > To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c<br>
> > files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well<br>
> > (as a separate patch).<br>
><br>
> Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your<br>
> patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be<br>
> addressed separately).<br>
><br>
> Jean-Marc<br>
><br>
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin<br>
> <<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > On 11/22/2017 06:23 PM, Drew Allen wrote:<br>
> > > 1) I didn't change how multistream_decode_float works in the<br>
> argument<br>
> > > list... I noticed it changes it's arguments depending on whether<br>
> > > FIXED_POINT is used. I copied this style for the projection<br>
> API as<br>
> > well.<br>
> > > If this isn't desired, we should make those changes separately.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 2) See above.<br>
> ><br>
> > Just noticed the code will actually work because opus_val16 is<br>
> defined<br>
> > to the right thing, but I still think it's a bad idea. For<br>
> example, if<br>
> > you look at the public header, opus_projection_decode() has a pcm<br>
> > argument of type opus_int16*, so it's a bit confusing for the<br>
> C file to<br>
> > define pcm as opus_val16*, even if the two map to the same.<br>
> ><br>
> > > 3) I only zero out initially. For the matrix_multiply_out<br>
> > functions, we<br>
> > > need to be able to take a single decoded stream and add weighted<br>
> > > versions of it to each of the final output channels. This<br>
> zero-ing out<br>
> > > on stream 0 ensures the block is zero-set so we can<br>
> incrementally add<br>
> > > all the decoded streams to the output channels.<br>
> ><br>
> > OK, I see. In that case, you should replace the two for()<br>
> loops with<br>
> > just a single call to OPUS_COPY(). That should be both faster and<br>
> > simpler.<br>
> ><br>
> > > 4) See 3), short and float versions of multiply_out should<br>
> > function the<br>
> > > same.<br>
> ><br>
> > Again, I now see what that code is doing. Unfortunately, it means<br>
> > increased noise for fixed-point since we have to round<br>
> multiple times. I<br>
> > don't have a proposed fix for that, so I guess we'll have to<br>
> deal with<br>
> > it. However, instead of rounding tmp twice (>>8 followed by<br>
> +64>>7), you<br>
> > should only round once. That means (tmp+16384)>>15<br>
> ><br>
> > Cheers,<br>
> ><br>
> > Jean-Marc<br>
> ><br>
> > > Let me know your thoughts.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Cheers,<br>
> > > Drew<br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:39 PM Jean-Marc Valin<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>>><br>
> > > <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>>>>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Hi Drew,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Had a look at your patch. I think it's on the right track --<br>
> > there's no<br>
> > > fundamental issue with it as far as I can tell. There's<br>
> a few<br>
> > > implementation issues though.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 1) In opus_multi_stream_decode_float(), you changed the pcm<br>
> > argument<br>
> > > from float* to opus_val16*. That's a mistake and will<br>
> fail for<br>
> > > fixed-point. This should have shown up as an error on a<br>
> > fixed-point<br>
> > > build. Make sure you test that.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 2) In opus_projection_decode(), you also changed the pcm<br>
> > argument to an<br>
> > > opus_val16*, which again will cause problems for the same<br>
> > reasons as 1).<br>
> > > Please check you haven't made that same mistake elsewhere.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 3) In opus_projection_copy_channel_out_float() and<br>
> > > opus_projection_copy_channel_out_short(), you're zeroing the<br>
> > values with<br>
> > > this loop:<br>
> > > for (i=0;i<frame_size;i++)<br>
> > > {<br>
> > > for (j=0;j<dst_stride;j++)<br>
> > > {<br>
> > > float_dst[i*dst_stride+j] = 0;<br>
> > > }<br>
> > > }<br>
> > > That looks wrong, since you'll be overwriting all channels<br>
> > instead of<br>
> > > just the one you're copying. That should have come up in<br>
> > testing, no?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > 4) You might want to have a look at<br>
> > > mapping_matrix_multiply_channel_out_short(). I can't quite<br>
> > follow what<br>
> > > it's doing, but it seems wrong since the whole point of<br>
> adding<br>
> > the "tmp"<br>
> > > is to avoid rounding multiple times.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I haven't had time to thoroughly review the changes to<br>
> > mapping_matrix.c,<br>
> > > but I'll do that on your revised version.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Cheers,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Jean-Marc<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > On 11/20/2017 05:15 PM, Drew Allen wrote:<br>
> > > > Hello,<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Attached is a patch to resolve a memory issue using the<br>
> > Projection API<br>
> > > > when compiling using a psuedo-stack / limited memory.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Please let me any ?s you might have.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > Cheers,<br>
> > > > Drew<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > > opus mailing list<br>
> > > > <a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a>><br>
> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org" target="_blank">opus@xiph.org</a>>>><br>
> > > > <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus</a><br>
> > > ><br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div></div>