<div dir="ltr">Thanks!</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca" target="_blank">jmvalin@jmvalin.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">For anything below 6 kb/s, I would actually recommend using codec2<br>
rather than Speex or Opus.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Jean-Marc<br>
<span class=""><br>
On 04/11/14 05:55 PM, Manpreet Singh wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
</span>> I noticed that <a href="http://speex.org" target="_blank">speex.org</a> <<a href="http://speex.org" target="_blank">http://speex.org</a>> has a banner that mentions<br>
<div><div class="h5">> that Opus is better than Speex in all aspects. The supported bitrate<br>
> range for Speex seems to be as low as 2kbps though but Opus can only go<br>
> as low as 6kbps. Is this one aspect where Speex is still preferred? (I<br>
> understand that it's not a very common scenario though).<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Manpreet.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> opus mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:opus@xiph.org">opus@xiph.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus</a><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>