<div dir="ltr">I thought I would run the same benchmarks on my PC that I have been running on my Pi. This is a very different beast as it is a i7-4770 with 4 cores (8 with hyperthreading) and 16GB RAM.<div><br></div><div>This is a bit academic as any x86 PC in the last 10 years can encode very quickly and unless you are converting a huge catalogue you will not notice a small change in speed.</div>
<div><br></div><div>That being said I wanted to see if the speed changes I saw on the Pi were reflected on the PC as well. In short they seem to be. It is a mixed bag for 1.1 which is faster at some bitrates only on some complexities. Overall it is slower than 1.0.3 or even 0.9.14.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Again on a PC it is probably worth it for the new features and quality improvement but just thought I would show it.</div><div><br></div><div>As it went so fast I had to change how I got the speed. I now measure elapsed time in seconds to complete. This flips the graphs from my other benchmarks as lower is now faster. I am re-running this on the PI as well so they are consistent but it will take another 24 hours to complete.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As the PC is so fast I ran at 6, 16, 24, 32, 64, 96 and 128kbps. </div><div><br></div><div>The charts can all be seen here:<a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmUOhhaYBtrKdDZlUThEUWdJRG9zM2VPNTFTZ29PWkE&usp=sharing"> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmUOhhaYBtrKdDZlUThEUWdJRG9zM2VPNTFTZ29PWkE&usp=sharing</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Next music and then I will try fixed point.</div><div> <br clear="all"><div><div>Best Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Stuart Marsden</div><div><br></div><div>Tactical Communications Consultant</div><div>
FinMars Consulting Ltd</div><div>UK: +441865589833
</div><div>Finland: +358453046287</div></div>
</div></div>