<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.E-MailFormatvorlage18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=DE link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>We will make same soon (Feb). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>I would be happy to understand how you did your perform measurement and which parameters you used.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'>Christian<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Courier New";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:DE'>--<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:DE'>Universität Tübingen, Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen, Germany<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:DE'>Tel +49 7071 2970532, Fax +49 7071 5220<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:DE'><a href="http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/staff/hoene.html">http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/staff/hoene.html</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:DE'>Von:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";mso-fareast-language:DE'> opus-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces@xiph.org] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Olle Frimanson<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 08:15<br><b>An:</b> opus@xiph.org<br><b>Betreff:</b> [opus] Compexity vs Quality<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=SV>Hi,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=SV><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>The complexity settings in Opus affects the CPU load a lot, below are some preliminary figures (MIPS) we got on Samsung Galaxy S2 1.2 (1.2 GHz ARM7)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>8KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/8000 C0 56.51<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>8KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/8000 C5 106.06<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>8KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/8000 C10 156.55<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>16KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/16000 C0 99.19<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>16KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/16000 C5 196.00<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>16KHz codec encode/decode - OPUS/16000 C10 293.12<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>My question is if anybody have “real” testing on how complexity setting impact speech quality?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>BR/Olle<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>