[opus] opus 1.2.1 regression with --enable-float-approx and --0fast
Jean-Marc Valin
jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
Fri Feb 23 02:53:57 UTC 2018
On 02/22/2018 09:34 PM, Stepan Salenikovich wrote:
> Its unexpected because the decoder continues to output all samples
> of -32768 even when the microphone input is silence or near silence, so
> I would expect the decoded values to be at or near 0.
Oh, if the output is stuck at -32768, then it's likely some NaNs crept
in. The first thing to check is whether the problem is on the encoder
side or the decoder side (when if you use a 1.1 encoder with a 1.2
decoder and vice versa). In general, -Ofast is not IEEE-compliant when
it comes to NaN, so libopus has to work around that non-compliance.
> I will try to reproduce with opus_demo or opus-tools.
Thanks, that'll help a lot.
Jean-Marc
>
>
> Optionally, if you could bisect the git repo to see where the problem
> started.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> On 02/22/2018 07:15 PM, Stepan Salenikovich wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I work on a webRTC application and recently tried updating from opus
> > 1.1.5 to 1.2.1
> >
> > Afterwards I noticed occasionally weird audio glitches. I finally
> > tracked down the issue to the opus decoder in my application
> outputting
> > samples with the value of -32768.
> >
> > This behaviour stopped when reverting to opus 1.1.5 or compiling opus
> > 1.2.1 without configuring --enable-float-aprox and --0fast.
> >
> > The setup is a microphone as audio input into chrome v64 which then
> > sends opus encoded audio to my application and my application decoding
> > this audio stream.
> >
> > I could induce the glitches by breathing/blowing really loudly
> into the
> > microphone. I noticed that occasionally this would result in the opus
> > decoder in my application to keep outputting a stream of -32768
> (even if
> > I stopped) until I talked normally for a bit.
> >
> > Is it possible that a regression was introduced between 1.1.5 and
> 1.2.1
> > when configuring with --enable-float-approx and compiling
> with --0fast?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -stepan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > opus mailing list
> > opus at xiph.org <mailto:opus at xiph.org>
> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
> <http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus>
> >
>
>
More information about the opus
mailing list