[opus] [PATCH] Fix memory issue in Projection API
Jean-Marc Valin
jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
Thu Nov 23 18:34:11 UTC 2017
On 11/23/2017 01:28 PM, Drew Allen wrote:
> To your first point, I was only trying to copy how _multistream_'s c
> files function in this way, possibly that's worth refactoring as well
> (as a separate patch).
Well, the opus_multistream_decode_* calls were correct before your
patch. It's only the encode ones that have the issues (should be
addressed separately).
Jean-Marc
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
> <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote:
>
> On 11/22/2017 06:23 PM, Drew Allen wrote:
> > 1) I didn't change how multistream_decode_float works in the argument
> > list... I noticed it changes it's arguments depending on whether
> > FIXED_POINT is used. I copied this style for the projection API as
> well.
> > If this isn't desired, we should make those changes separately.
> >
> > 2) See above.
>
> Just noticed the code will actually work because opus_val16 is defined
> to the right thing, but I still think it's a bad idea. For example, if
> you look at the public header, opus_projection_decode() has a pcm
> argument of type opus_int16*, so it's a bit confusing for the C file to
> define pcm as opus_val16*, even if the two map to the same.
>
> > 3) I only zero out initially. For the matrix_multiply_out
> functions, we
> > need to be able to take a single decoded stream and add weighted
> > versions of it to each of the final output channels. This zero-ing out
> > on stream 0 ensures the block is zero-set so we can incrementally add
> > all the decoded streams to the output channels.
>
> OK, I see. In that case, you should replace the two for() loops with
> just a single call to OPUS_COPY(). That should be both faster and
> simpler.
>
> > 4) See 3), short and float versions of multiply_out should
> function the
> > same.
>
> Again, I now see what that code is doing. Unfortunately, it means
> increased noise for fixed-point since we have to round multiple times. I
> don't have a proposed fix for that, so I guess we'll have to deal with
> it. However, instead of rounding tmp twice (>>8 followed by +64>>7), you
> should only round once. That means (tmp+16384)>>15
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Drew
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:39 PM Jean-Marc Valin
> <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>
> > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Drew,
> >
> > Had a look at your patch. I think it's on the right track --
> there's no
> > fundamental issue with it as far as I can tell. There's a few
> > implementation issues though.
> >
> > 1) In opus_multi_stream_decode_float(), you changed the pcm
> argument
> > from float* to opus_val16*. That's a mistake and will fail for
> > fixed-point. This should have shown up as an error on a
> fixed-point
> > build. Make sure you test that.
> >
> > 2) In opus_projection_decode(), you also changed the pcm
> argument to an
> > opus_val16*, which again will cause problems for the same
> reasons as 1).
> > Please check you haven't made that same mistake elsewhere.
> >
> > 3) In opus_projection_copy_channel_out_float() and
> > opus_projection_copy_channel_out_short(), you're zeroing the
> values with
> > this loop:
> > for (i=0;i<frame_size;i++)
> > {
> > for (j=0;j<dst_stride;j++)
> > {
> > float_dst[i*dst_stride+j] = 0;
> > }
> > }
> > That looks wrong, since you'll be overwriting all channels
> instead of
> > just the one you're copying. That should have come up in
> testing, no?
> >
> > 4) You might want to have a look at
> > mapping_matrix_multiply_channel_out_short(). I can't quite
> follow what
> > it's doing, but it seems wrong since the whole point of adding
> the "tmp"
> > is to avoid rounding multiple times.
> >
> > I haven't had time to thoroughly review the changes to
> mapping_matrix.c,
> > but I'll do that on your revised version.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jean-Marc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/2017 05:15 PM, Drew Allen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Attached is a patch to resolve a memory issue using the
> Projection API
> > > when compiling using a psuedo-stack / limited memory.
> > >
> > > Please let me any ?s you might have.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Drew
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > opus mailing list
> > > opus at xiph.org <mailto:opus at xiph.org> <mailto:opus at xiph.org
> <mailto:opus at xiph.org>>
> > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
> > >
> >
>
More information about the opus
mailing list