[CELT-dev] fixed point code

Timothy B. Terriberry tterribe at xiph.org
Thu Mar 3 13:31:50 PST 2011

> I have not measured those, but I'm sure it's under 100k. Also, it's
> probably possible to make CELT more efficient than it currently is
> when it comes to stack size.

MUCH more efficient. The MDCT alone I think uses two to three times more 
temporary storage than necessary.

More information about the celt-dev mailing list