[CELT-dev] One question about comparison between HE-AAC v2 and CELT
tsingmei at gmail.com
Thu Aug 5 08:01:00 PDT 2010
But Cisco adopts HE-AAC in it's telepresence product which is the dominant
HD video conference product. They use hardware to decrease the delay?
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Alex Converse <alex.converse at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:49 AM, wei <tsingmei at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > I visited celt website. I saw the comparison between AAC-LD with celt.
> > how about the HE-AAC? If the scenario is that we limit the bandwidth to
> > 50kbps, will music encoded by HE-AAC v2 be better than CELT? What's
> > v2's delay?
> He-AACv2 is not a low delay codec at all. It is much worse than
> AAC-LC. It has a delay of about 405 ms.
> for a full analysis
> Alex Converse
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the celt-dev