So to which group should I foward my question? I thought this was the most appropriate of them all. Please guide me<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Monty Montgomery <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:monty@xiph.org">monty@xiph.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I have the impression only a small piece of this conversation is being<br>
forwarded to ogg-dev. We can't answer questions when we have no idea<br>
what's going on :-)<br>
<div class="im"><br>
>> no, But I will say that tools wise, I have content that does not encode<br>
>> with xiph and does with ffmpeg. So roughly my tool recommendation is:<br>
>> oggenc2 -o trek2.ogg trek2.wav<br>
>> ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -s 1280x544 -r 23.976 -i trek.1280x544_24Hz_P420.yuv<br>
>> -b 2000000 -vcodec libtheora -an trek.ogv<br>
>> oggz-merge trek2.ogg trek.ogv -o trek2.ogv<br>
>> ffmpeg is not good with the audio or muxing<br>
<br>
</div>ffmpeg will also screw up the video<br>
<div class="im"><br>
>> xiph is not good at video<br>
<br>
</div>that ffmpeg command line is telling ffmpeg *not* to use its internal<br>
video, but to use the external xiph encoder (libtheora) instead. In<br>
fact, ffmpeg's internal ogg and theora support is somewhat broken<br>
across the board. Our ffmpeg2theora application uses ffmpeg for<br>
everything *except* the ogg production.<br>
<br>
Again, can't help only seeing a handful of the messages.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Monty<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Solomon Kariri,<br><br>Software Developer,<br>Cell: +254736 729 450<br>Skype: solomonkariri<br>