[ogg-dev] -O20 ?
monty at xiph.org
Tue Feb 21 12:00:43 PST 2012
Indeed, it was merely whimsy from long ago. It had originally been
-O18, but everyone knows 20 is two better.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Ralph Giles <giles at xiph.org> wrote:
> On 21 February 2012 11:23, Simmons, Aaron <asimmons at rosettastone.com> wrote:
>> libogg’s configure script passes -O20 as a CFLAG. This is causing problems
>> when using non-gcc compilers, such as clang
> I think the idea was just to cover all the bases.
> Have you filed a clang bug? It would be sad to lose what little whimsy
> is left in the world
> Otherwise, I suppose we should check whether the compiler supports the
> options we're passing.
> Ralph Giles
> Xiph.org Foundation for open multimedia
> ogg-dev mailing list
> ogg-dev at xiph.org
More information about the ogg-dev