[ogg-dev] libogg++ release 1.1.0

[ter]

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 10:18 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:09 AM, ter<et at ihear.com> wrote:
> 
> > I was trying to be flippant, and maybe not succeeding. Hopefully, others
> > working in the linguistic areas will find ALingA useful, and ogl will
> > emerge as a new type without requiring too much from me.
> 
> BTW, .ala is just as valid as .ogl; it just depends on whether you
> want to emphasize it's an ogg container file or not. We were offering
> .ogx because it already has an registered mime-type; that won't ensure
> hand off to specifically your application, of course.
> 
>  -r
I'll take all your comments into consideration if it becomes necessary
to make such a formal choice. It seems to me to be a little early to do
that now before more applications are developed using ALingA.

Regards,
Elaine