[ogg-dev] [Schrodinger-devel] ogg dirac granulepos in oggz tools

Ralph Giles giles at xiph.org
Thu Nov 13 14:59:58 PST 2008

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:04 AM, David Schleef <ds at schleef.org> wrote:

>> Are the reported granulepos of the packetno 2 and 3 correct? The dt
>> value looks large.
> Those should be -4 and -2, repsectively.  Otherwise, those numbers
> appear correct.

Conrad, I'd guess the oggz-validate test is wrong then. It's not that
granulepos must be numerically non-decreasing, but that they must map
to a a non-decreasing timestamp. Testing the actual field value is not
technically correct, even it the dirac mapping turns out to maintain
that for some choice of signedness.


More information about the ogg-dev mailing list