[ogg-dev] OggPCM: support for little-endianness only?

[Sampo Syreeni]

On 2007-12-30, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:

> In any format that is to be used on both, it is always better to pick 
> one and stick with it.

Then recommend one single format. Nobody *has* to support all of the 
features present, yet it makes sense to *allow* common variances. Most 
of all, because:

> Unless you can guarantee that you're writing streams that are only 
> going to be passed within a single architecture, allowing both formats 
> is always worse.

...some people *are* able to guarantee that. Why hinder them?
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy at iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111
student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2