[ogg-dev] OggPCM: support for little-endianness only?
decoy at iki.fi
Wed Feb 13 17:53:16 PST 2008
On 2007-12-30, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
> In any format that is to be used on both, it is always better to pick
> one and stick with it.
Then recommend one single format. Nobody *has* to support all of the
features present, yet it makes sense to *allow* common variances. Most
of all, because:
> Unless you can guarantee that you're writing streams that are only
> going to be passed within a single architecture, allowing both formats
> is always worse.
...some people *are* able to guarantee that. Why hinder them?
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy at iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111
student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
More information about the ogg-dev