[ogg-dev] Ogg bitwise.c bit tracking

[Silvia Pfeiffer]

On Feb 8, 2008 10:44 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at email.unc.edu>
wrote:

> None of that means there aren't other very good reasons we should pull
> the bitpacker out of libogg that have nothing to do with speed. People
> seem to have a philosophical problem with linking to libogg when they
> want to mux Vorbis in non-Ogg containers, even though the only
> Ogg-specific parts of libogg are a single C file which compiles to a
> single object file smaller than 30K. The only people who actually care
> about something so small are embedded developers, who would use Tremor
> (with its own built-in bitpacker) anyway.
>

It's also a psychological and a "good sw design" issue. You just don't need
to have code in your executable that you will never call.

Silvia.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/ogg-dev/attachments/20080213/1d883f67/attachment.htm