[ogg-dev] final changes to mimetypes rfc
giles at xiph.org
Mon Aug 18 09:24:10 PDT 2008
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:31 AM, the discussion surrounded:
>>>>> Technically it is a Vorbis I bitstream, but I think we should leave
>>>>> that flexible. Any other opinions?
I would leave it unspecified. It seems unlikely to me that any
follow-up audio codec would end up being called Vorbis II.
I suppose we could poll Monty for intent, but the media-type doesn't
distinguish, so we'd in effect just make 'Vorbis II' naming contingent
on compatibilty with the spec. I.e. having the same magic and version
More information about the ogg-dev