[ogg-dev] final changes to mimetypes rfc

[Ralph Giles]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:31 AM, the discussion surrounded:

>>>>> Technically it is a Vorbis I bitstream, but I think we should leave
>>>>> that flexible. Any other opinions?

I would leave it unspecified. It seems unlikely to me that any
follow-up audio codec would end up being called Vorbis II.

I suppose we could poll Monty for intent, but the media-type doesn't
distinguish, so we'd in effect just make 'Vorbis II' naming contingent
on compatibilty with the spec. I.e. having the same magic and version
field location.

 -r