[ogg-dev] Feedback on XML metadata namespace

[Daniel Aleksandersen]

Here is a re-typed version of the page. A little shorter and I did not 
remember everything:
http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=VorbisComment&oldid=7363
(current version http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=VorbisComment)

On Wednesday 12. September 2007 21:05:53 Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> On 2007-09-12, Ralph wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:26:14PM +0200, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> > > > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment
> > >
> > > I updated the page with constructive proposals and structure.
> >
> > I don't see any proposals beyond the linked pages?
>
> I updated the page!! Wrote about fifty lines! I *know* I saved because I
> was discussing this with a friend over IM, showing him the link to the
> page. My edit is not in the page's history either.
>
> Have anyone restored from a backup or something? :-S
>
> I will just have to write the page AGAIN. (Feeling no love for MediaWiki
> right now.)
>
> > > See the new RIGHTS field name; dropping LICENSE and COPYRIGHT) for
> > > instance.
> >
> > I think we should add some clarification to some of the existing
> > fields. This is all supposedly human readable, but it makes sense for
> > some fields or combinations of fields to be machinable as well. For
> > example, we've been telling people for years to use iso date format in
> > the DATE tag. Likewise, LICENSE should contain a url which uniquely
> > identifies the license if one is available a la Creative Commons.
> >
> > The problem I've seen with having both COPYRIGHT and LICENSE is that
> > some people put the license in the COPYRIGHT, so readers should
> > interpret a license URL in that tag if none is found under LICENSE.
>
> See the wiki page in hald an hour.
-- 
Daniel Aleksandersen