<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Right, BUTT can be set to push to studio, and studio's IP is
fixed. <br>
</p>
<p>It doesn't appear that Icecast Master can push to a Slave at
studio, Slave at studio has to pull from Master, and Master's IP
address is not fixed. So for our remotes, BUTT is the better
choice for that, and all the other reasons you mention. <br>
</p>
<p>Plus, when you are recording eight bands in a 12-hour broadcast
day, BUTT's ability to stop the local dump-file/recording, save
it, and start a new recording with a different name, all without
stopping the stream, is a real plus when all those bands want
recordings of their sets. Darkice has to be stopped and a new
dump-file name put into the config file for each band, which kills
the stream and makes listeners sad. Or you get back to the station
with a 12-hour-long mp3 that you have to edit down into band-set
lengths. <br>
</p>
<p>That said, at the station, where we are running BUTT on a very
low-horsepower Linux box to send the station's "Listen Live"
stream to our Icecast hosting company, I am considering using
Darkice + Icecast on a Raspberry Pi 3 which has more than enough
horsepower for that function. The station has a fixed IP so we can
point their Slave to our Master. <br>
</p>
<p>Thanks for all the tips here. <br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
That Jack Elliott
(541) 848 7021
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
Producer, The Wednesday Point
Host, The Sunday Classics
</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/20/2017 4:30 PM, Robert Jeffares
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:ed2877d5-73ba-d847-b551-c44491612628@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<p><br>
It does not matter what IP BUTT has, it sends to the fixed IP at
the studio on port [ 8000 ] with a mount like /liveBroadcast.mp3
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/04/17 11:05, Jack Elliott
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:399d416c-29c8-e7a1-d12c-8a9fe4be3c4b@kpov.org"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<p>Ha! Terms even a broadcaster can understand! Many many
thanks.</p>
<p>If BUTT is considered to be as good a transporter as Icecast,
then I will stick with what I'm doing, if for no other reason
than, "Master is the source server (where the source comes
from) and Slave is the relay. THe connection is initiated by
the slave to the master."</p>
<p>Slave may not know where the Master is. Master (on a table in
front of me at a remote music event) may be at unknown/dynamic
IP address. I'd have to find my IP address, Teamview into the
server computer at the station, stop the Icecast service, edit
icecast.xml with my current IP address, and re-start the
Icecast service. <br>
</p>
<p>Is there any way to "push" a connection from Master to Slave?
Slave is at a fixed IP address. <br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
That Jack Elliott
(541) 848 7021
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
Producer, The Wednesday Point
Host, The Sunday Classics
</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/19/2017 8:47 PM, David
Saunders wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOjZz+n0SSCU-oA6AM5Atc6pQO=4G9qWoKA9qKkLK5rbtc7rMw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">ok let see if I can translate it to broadcaster
terms for ya :)
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A icecast server can be set up to accept direct source
connection. ie dark ice( which i do agree runs better on
the machine where icecast server is. ) I do use it to
trans-code the mount to different encoding. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>THe icecast server can also set up as a relay, where it
pulls in from the another server. Primary used to pull
the stream from a icecast server. Then make it available
to be acceded by clients from it mounts. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But, BUTT is designed to stream to an icecast server,
and does very well. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/relaying.html">http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/relaying.html</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Master is the source server (where the source comes
from) ad Slave is the relay. THe connection is initiated
by the slave to the master. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>BUTT ---MASTER ========= SLAVE ===== Clients</div>
<div>--- can be local host or lan or wan private or public </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>== is public connections wans/lans/...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If you need more bandwidth you can setup/rent other
SLAVEs on other networks to augment you bandwidth.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It lot easier to have 1 master and bunch of slaves to
spreading the bandwidth out, It easier to maintain a
single master with many mounts + it easy to trace problems
down with sources going to a common Master. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I tend to diverge from your question a bit. But, your
encoder should work find with broadcaster to the icecast
server by itself. I have had it done for the past 10
years. The only real issue s when you encode the stream
higher then what he bandwidth can handle. remember the
source clients use the UPLOAD speed of you connection and
the client use the UPLOAD speeds. In the USA it no
uncommon to have uploads speeds to be far slower then you
can download. Also I am talking about how fast the
connection is not how much data you have in a month. It
get really confusing when you talk about bandwidth, since
they call both bandwidths.One is how big your pipe is and
other how much you get through the pipe in a given time. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Lot of the extra above fore those reading this and nee
d a little more clarity :)</div>
<div>David</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>SLAVE looks a the master waiting for something to do.
When it sees the mount it relays it.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:33 PM,
Jack Elliott <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thatjackelliott@kpov.org" target="_blank">thatjackelliott@kpov.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><i>I made an error, I swapped two diagrams, it
should be this:</i></p>
<p>Here's how I've been doing it:<br>
</p>
<p><tt>BUTT ===> WAN ===> Icecast server</tt> </p>
<p>I thought I might try this instead: <br>
</p>
<p><tt><tt>BUTT --> localhost Icecast server
===> WAN ===> Icecast server</tt></tt></p>
<pre class="m_3588810320712558112moz-signature" cols="72">--
That Jack Elliott
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%28541%29%20848-7021" value="+15418487021" target="_blank">(541) 848 7021</a>
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
Producer, The Wednesday Point
Host, The Sunday Classics
</pre>
<div class="m_3588810320712558112moz-cite-prefix">On
4/19/2017 4:00 PM, Jack Elliott wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>Hi David, I don't think we will necessarily be on
wifi, I'm sorry if I implied that. There are a
couple of events each year when we have to use
wifi, but for those I have a dedicated access
point running at close to 1 watt connected
directly to our ISP's network. <br>
</p>
<p>Okay, I was told over on the Darkice listserv
that using Darkice > WAN > Icecast is not
very reliable, and my testing supported that
statement. They said that Darkice is an encoder,
and Icecast is a transporter. Icecast, they said,
is very reliable, Darkice is a good encoder but
not too great as a transporter. <br>
</p>
<p>I've been using BUTT as the encoder at the remote
(audio source) end, and sending the stream over
the WAN to the Icecast server at the station
building. BUTT, I found, is more reliable than
Darkice at the encoding end. <br>
</p>
<p>Here's how I've been doing it:<br>
</p>
<p><tt>BUTT --> localhost Icecast server ===>
WAN ===> Icecast server</tt><br>
</p>
<p>I thought I might try this instead: <br>
</p>
<p><tt>BUTT ===> WAN ===> Icecast server</tt></p>
<p>Now here I want to avoid using incorrect
terminology. The way I am using the word "remote"
is how it is used in broadcast: if a crew leaves
the building to broadcast an event occurring
outside the station somewhere, they are doing a
remote. <br>
</p>
<p>So in my case, the "remote" is at the music
festival - my audio source. <br>
</p>
<p>So when you write, "The relay easiest to
configured in a pull configuration. Where the
setting are setup on the remote server." -- is it
correct for me to interpret that to mean that I
can leave the settings on the station computer's
server alone, just set up the server in my remote
kit to "pull" from the station's server? <br>
</p>
<p>I am puzzled by "pull," since I am wanting to
send audio from me to the station, but that's
pulling? <br>
</p>
<pre class="m_3588810320712558112moz-signature" cols="72">--
That Jack Elliott
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%28541%29%20848-7021" value="+15418487021" target="_blank">(541) 848 7021</a>
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio
Producer, The Wednesday Point
Host, The Sunday Classics
</pre>
<div class="m_3588810320712558112moz-cite-prefix">On
4/19/2017 10:26 AM, David Saunders wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hey,
<div><br>
</div>
<div> The relay easiest to configured in a pull
configuration. Where the setting are setup on
the remote server.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> Since the client is on WiFi, you will
have lots of issues streaming due to the ever
changing wifi environment. My suggestion is
source the stream at the lowest settings for
encoding you can live with, This will keep the
bandwidth down and less likely burp on you.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> We do have clients who use WiFi and set
the the encoding to smallest size for the
content being recorded. Most of the time since
its voice content we really don't have to go
super high on the encoding. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> I have set up the relay to supplement our
bandwidth when we think it will be over the
limit. Just remember you need to give the
listeners the remote server connection info
not the local server. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> Why it would be better? not sure why, but
if the icecast server is set with a larger
buffer, it will buffer thru the disconnects of
the source. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>David.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at
11:02 AM, Marvin Scholz <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:epirat07@gmail.com"
target="_blank">epirat07@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On 19 Apr 2017, at 16:20, Jack Elliott
wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> For our
community radio station's live music
festivals broadcasts, we set up a small
broadcast studio at the festival's venue,
and use B.U.T.T. to send a stream to an
Icecast server located at the radio
station's building.<br>
<br>
REMOTE LOCATION
STATION BUILDING<br>
B.U.T.T. ======= WAN
=======>> ICECAST SERVER<br>
<br>
It's pretty reliable, though BUTT does
sometimes lose connection, probably due to
network congestion.<br>
<br>
The folks on the Darkice listserv claim
that using Icecast to do the sending
provides a more reliable connection. So I
want to try this idea:<br>
<br>
REMOTE LOCATION
STATION BUILDING<br>
B.U.T.T. --> Icecast on localhost ====
WAN ====>> ICECAST SERVER<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I am not sure how this could be more
reliable than BUTT alone.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
I'm finding the terminology for setting up
a relay (on <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.0/config-file.html#relay"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://icecast.org/docs/icecas<wbr>t-2.4.0/config-file.html#relay</a><wbr>)
to be a bit confusing and could use some
help.<br>
<br>
I believe I want to set up a Specific
Mountpoint Relay. It's where the IP
addresses get plugged in that I need some
clarification. The IP address for the
building is static, but the IP address for
the remote server is unknown before every
festival, and may be dynamic.<br>
<br>
The documentation says that for the
<relay> section of the xml, we have
a <server>127.0.0.1</server>
setting. And that is described as "This is
the IP for the server which contains the
mountpoint to be relayed."<br>
<br>
I can't tell whether the <relay?
section is on the remote server, in which
case we only need to put the static IP of
the building in the <server>
section, or whether the <relay>
section is on the building's server, in
which case we need to know ahead of time
what our remote IP will be, and hope it
doesn't change during the festival.<br>
<br>
I hope this question makes sense. My
confusion is clearly because I am unclear
which server (remote or building) the
<relay> section applies to.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
That Jack Elliott<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%28541%29%20848%207021"
value="+15418487021" target="_blank">(541)
848 7021</a><br>
KPOV 88.9 FM High Desert Community radio<br>
Producer, The Wednesday Point<br>
Host, The Sunday Classics<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Icecast mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org"
target="_blank">Icecast@xiph.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/icecast</a><br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Icecast mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org"
target="_blank">Icecast@xiph.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/icecast</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset
class="m_3588810320712558112mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Icecast mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_3588810320712558112moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org" target="_blank">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_3588810320712558112moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/icecast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<fieldset class="m_3588810320712558112mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Icecast mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_3588810320712558112moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org" target="_blank">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_3588810320712558112moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/icecast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________
Icecast mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/icecast</a>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Icecast mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Icecast mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-signature">--
<b>Communication Consultants</b>
64 Warner Park Avenue
Laingholm
Auckland 0604
09 8176358
0221693124
06 650 6087
</div>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Icecast mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Icecast@xiph.org">Icecast@xiph.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast">http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body></html>