Thomas B. Rücker
thomas at ruecker.fi
Wed Jul 31 16:19:33 UTC 2019
On 7/31/19 2:44 PM, unosonic wrote:
> Thomas B. Rücker:
>> After all, Icecast is just another web server.
>> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially
>> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but 80
>> and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred.
> makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same IP,
> that would not work. Unless I want to use Icecast as a nginx or apache
> replacement ;)
You *can* run it on any port. 80/443 is clearly preferred and servers or
IP addresses, especially IPv6, are cheap.
If I'd have to run a production environment, I wouldn't spend a second
considering that matter and spin up a second machine or IP address.
More information about the Icecast